Here's the deal: Since 1995, content from third-parties (like you and me) has been protected by a law called Section 230, which shields websites to a large extent from being held legally responsible for what others publish on their sites. Section 230 gives sites like Twitter, Facebook, and Vimeo the freedom to make their own rules for what content they'll allow without fearing that they'll be sued or shut down by the government.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation calls Section 230 “the most important law protecting Internet speech.”
But in May, President Trump—angered over his perception that social media sites like Twitter are biased against him—ordered a review of Section 230.That review asks the FCC to make several changes to Section 230 that would severely weaken the rule, opening platforms to lawsuits or government action if the FCC doesn't approve of their terms of service or how they're enforced.
Under these new rules, platforms that host our content would be pressured to censor anything that might upset the government.
This is a free speech emergency, and we need a massive response. We have less than a month to drive as many people as possible to comment on the FCC website, so we're going to post ads and use social media to spread the word far and wide.
Section 230 is the shield we have all users in posting any kind of content without censorship, and now we must fight and pressuring to FCC in order to get our opinion on the table, and the limit date is September 2nd. These are the sites in which you can write your messages:
Twitter:
@AjitPaiFCC
@BrendsnCarrFCC
@GeoffreyStarks
And don’t forget to donate to Open Media for contributing the Internet Defense:
https://action.openmedia.org/page/65674/donate/1?ea.url.id=4863422&forwarded=true
You can leave your comments in this link:
https://action.openmedia.org/page/65697/donate/1
That’s all for this article, and any new information about this subject, you will know immediately with punctuality and seriousness. See you next time Female Muscle Fans.